I've been writing a paper for my class.
No, actually, I haven't. Total brain block. So, ok, here are some thoughts to the world in general, thinking maybe it'll get me started. I'm being hindered by too much time as a hobbyist linguist.
Urban Ecology. What is it?
Ecology originated in a limited scope to mean the interactions of living organisms. But we love mucking up language, so it's grown in meaning to encompass anything that might could act in an environmental or ecological manner, by which many assume we mean "environmentally friendly." I don't assume the friendly part, which is over simplified and too messy. (Half of everything "environmentally friendly or preferable" results in ecological nightmares. Don't get me started on ethanol.) So, can cities act in an ecological manner? Seems pretty obvious that they can and do.
Is it about how to bring ecologically balanced processes to urban areas
or about understanding the ecological processes already at play in urban areas
or about the ecology and evolution of the urban space as an entity
Or about them all? Or something else?
Urban. Even here there is treacherous ground. Can Dubai be compared to Melbourne be compared to New York be compared to Charlottesville? Is DC just the city inside the District lines or the whole metro area? What about density? Portland and DC (District only) have about the same number of inhabitants but are vastly different in area. Should we begin to look at urban areas in terms of their biospheres (watersheds, arable land)? Obviously the impact on the environment of Dubai (desert city) is different from Chicago (close to water and agricultural lands).
Put them together and what do we get? Or are we trying to figure out what we want?